Subject: Re: Painful Facts "Dr. Typo-pounce" Xemblinosky Can Never Refute
Date:    Fri, 11 Jun 1999 00:54:46 -0700
From:    çu <koitsenka@hotmail.com>
Orgs:    BBoH4,RLAC&TS,KoTAGoR4,ELF#13,Duchess of Urls,goddess#8,
Groups:  alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die, alt.genius.bill-palmer, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.romath, alt.clubs.just.for.fun
 
§ergi wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 22:17:21 -0700, LunaticFringe@The.Edge
> (Checkmate.©) wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 09 Jun 1999 00:04:49 -0500, Bufford L. Hatchett put forth the
> >notion that:
> >
> >> Checkmate.© wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 9 Jun 1999 01:44:37 GMT, Bill Palmer put forth the notion that:
> >> >
> >> > > In <375D1DAE.3A7A@romath.bungmunch.edu> "J. Raoul Xemblinosky III"
> >> > > <raoulx@romath.bungmunch.edu> "Dr. Typo-pounce" writes:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Bill Palmer wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >[snjip]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> ...and 2-Belo's "brilliant flame-weapon"--whereby
> >> > > >> the nitwit deliberately "satirically" misspells the
> >> > > >> name of someone who is arguably the best speller
> >> > > >> in the Flame World--proves incredibly pathetic.
> >> > >
> >> > > >>"Dr. Typo-pounce" Xemblinosky wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Clealy, sir, have just set a new world's record for irony. Or idiocy.
> >> > > >Probably both.
> >> > >
> >> > > Not in the least, Xemblinosky.  Naturally YOU feel
> >> > > threatened by my little reminder of the facts,
> >> > > since your pathetically boring song-and-dance
> >> > > routine on this topic all along has held that
> >> > > occasional typos by a writer/poster seriously
> >> > > affect the quality of the WRITING in a Usenet
> >> > > article.
> >> > >
> >> > > Certainly they don't.  Your entire con game involves
> >> > > your ignorant delusion that "typing" and "writing" are
> >> > > the same.  Any humor in the matter is only possible
> >> > > if you can get readers to share your fantasy, but
> >> > > most readers have far more intelligence than that--
> >> > > so only your oxymoronic "posting non-writing" loser-
> >> > > pals get your lame joke, Raoul.  Face up to it.
> >> > >
> >> > > Being capable of writing next to nothing worth reading,
> >> > > OF COURSE you would sit back and pounce the typos of
> >> > > WRITERS, Raoul.  It's about all you could be expected
> >> > > to do under the humiliating circumstances.
> >> > >
> >> > > One of the most unintentionally hilarious things
> >> > > you ever did was to keep pouncing the same ("clealy")
> >> > > ONE typo of mine LITERALLY several-hundred times
> >> > > while *I* was writing the series of original
> >> > > stand-alone articles that would make me the un-
> >> > > disputed World Champion of Flaming.  To say you
> >> > > made a fool of yourself acting like an envious
> >> > > mental-midget, Xemblinosky, would be grossly
> >> > > exaggerating (upwardly, of course) your current
> >> > > minuscule stature in the flame world!
> >> > >
> >> > > One of the most pathetic things about you stems
> >> > > from the way you try to prop up your typo-pounces
> >> > > by claiming crazily to see "irony" in my occasional
> >> > > typos, Raoul.  Nothing at all ironic about
> >> > > occasional typos, of course--unless the person
> >> > > making them denies that he ever makes ANY typos
> >> > > at all and then ironically pounces others.  I
> >> > > certainly don't.
> >> > >
> >> > > But, having no talent for WRITING, it is natural
> >> > > enough that YOU would attribute many non-existent
> >> > > qualities, such as successful irony, to your habitual--
> >> > > and habitually lame--typo-pounces, Xemblinosky.
> >> > >
> >> > > (Frankly, as far as I know, they don't gives a
> >> > > Pulitzer prize for spotting an "ironic" typo,
> >> > > but maybe someday your talents will be recognized,
> >> > > Raoul.)
> >> > >
> >> > > In reality, an occasional careless "hte" for
> >> > > "the" in a Usenet post has a negligible effect
> >> > > on the coherence of the article, and, far more
> >> > > important, the typos can always be weeded out
> >> > > for website or print publication.  With the
> >> > > sort of drivel YOU post, Xemblinosky, the
> >> > > best editor in the country could polish your
> >> > > "gems" 'til the cows come home and the result
> >> > > would merely be well-polished, but very trite,
> >> > > balderdash no one but you would want to read.
> >> > >
> >> > > Further, the ONLY way that typos can be evaluated
> >> > > in a meaningful way involves examination of the
> >> > > typo-RATE, which is determined by putting the
> >> > > number of words in the post having typos over
> >> > > the TOTAL number of words in the article (such
> >> > > as 2/800).  A thirty-word post with three typos
> >> > > (3/30) does not at all show the same proofreading
> >> > > competence as a one-thousand word post with three
> >> > > typos (3/1000).  THAT'S another big part of reality
> >> > > that your "humor" begs readers to overlook,
> >> > > Xemblinosky.
> >> > >
> >> > > When the all-important typo-RATE is examined,
> >> > > it becomes easy for any intelligent reader to see
> >> > > that I have a FAR LOWER typo-rate than the Usenet
> >> > > average, so your "Biil" lame misses the mark
> >> > > by ten miles and utterly fails as satire, since
> >> > > good satire needs some basis in reality, Raoul.
> >> > >
> >> > > Your failed humor attempts over my occasional
> >> > > typos would be akin to having a bunch of clods
> >> > > sit around and make lame jokes about Woody Allen's
> >> > > "girth".   I mean, since Woody Allen is not
> >> > > discernably fat, how much humor can anyone
> >> > > milk from stale joke-attempts about his "large
> >> > > waist size"?  No, Raoul, effective satire
> >> > > needs to have some basis in reality for it
> >> > > to work--self-congratulatory drivel from
> >> > > you and a few other talentless, typo-pouncing
> >> > > losers to the contrary.
> >> > >
> >> > > Of course, there is no basis at all for saying
> >> > > I'm anything but a top SPELLER.  That's because
> >> > > when you read a post of mine, though you find
> >> > > an occasional typo, the difficult words are
> >> > > almost always SPELLED correctly.  And on the
> >> > > rare occasions they are not, any "problem" will
> >> > > be simply an obvious typo.  Out of one-hundred
> >> > > times I use "existence", for instance, I might
> >> > > get careless once in proofreading and leave in
> >> > > an "exxistence", but I won't write "existance",
> >> > > the way a poor speller will.  That makes
> >> > > ALL the difference, as far as the miserable
> >> > > failure of your trivial typo-pouncing humor
> >> > > attempts, "Dr. Typo-pounce" Xemblinosky.
> >> > >
> >> > > What "virtual non-writers" such as yourself
> >> > > always want the readers to forget is that
> >> > > in the case of your own "articles", there
> >> > > is damn little actual WRITING worth of the
> >> > > name, Xemblinosky.  So you typo-pounce for
> >> > > dear life.
> >> > >
> >> > > Your habitual typo-pouncing of writers is
> >> > > simply your way of trying to divert attention
> >> > > from the pitiful, boring results of your band-
> >> > > width-wasting mental laziness, your shabby
> >> > > ignorance and shameless stupidity, and your
> >> > > total lack of WRITING talent, Typo-pouncer
> >> > > Raoul.  Shitass!
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > copyright FLAME GIANT
> >> > >
> >> > >           On Wordscreens of the World
> >> > > >
> >> >
> >> > Didn't you already post this rant once, or is this Deja News
> >> > all over again?
> >>
> >> Just once? Check out this little gem I just culled from
> >> article <7jjef4$gpj@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>:
> >>
> >>
> >>   What "virtual non-writers" such as yourself
> >>   always want the readers to forget is that
> >>   in the case of your own "articles", there
> >>   is damn little actual writing, Xemblinsky.
> >>
> >> Notice the misspelling of "Xemblinosky."
> >>
> >>
> >>   Your habitual typo-pouncing of writers is
> >>   simply your way of trying to divert attention
> >>   from your bandwidth-wasting public mental
> >>   laziness, your ignorance and shameless
> >>   stupidity, and your total lack of WRITING
> >>   talent, Typo-pouncer Raoul.  Shitass!
> >>
> >> ...hey, isn't this sounding a little familiar?
> >>
> >> Just tryin' to help,
> >> Bufford L. Hatchett
> >>
> >
> >Do you suppose that "Cut and Paste" Palmjob is actually the Spam Bot?
> 
> I thought the Spam Bot was Palmjob.
> 
That guy took a lot of words to say "I wish I was more like Raoul."
        çu
> --
> Lord §ergi of FluffyLand, Suppository With Ears
> KOTAGOR XXX, (bagde #e924387jsy928t6) PSL#24 BBOH #2
> "alt.romath : The Studio 54 of USENET"
> New Scotland Imperial Senator & Duke of Earls
> President, alt.romath Gentleman's Club
> Jar-Jar Binks Must Die! http://www.gumwrapper.com
> Dean of the AssNipple School of Plonkology, Bungmunch U.
> "Fuck the Four Line Sig Rule"
> segri@mailandnews.com
> 
> |\     /|\     /|\     /|\     /|\     /|
> | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ |
> | |   | | |   | | |   | | |   | | |   | |
> | |S  | | |E  | | |R  | | |G  | | |I  | |
> | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ | +---+ |
> |/_____\|/_____\|/_____\|/_____\|/_____\|
> 
> -.- --- - .- --. --- .-.   -..- -..- -..-
> 
> "Sergi appears to be proof that some suppositories have ears."
>         -Clifton Sharp  <374DB866.428CD37B@megsinet.net>
> 
> "Well Sergi,  my post of information and understanding certainly was not
> meant for you.  You have insulted me and that is a complete no no.
> Prepare for full out war and hope to hell you are able to withstand the
> consequences.  The battlefield will not be limited to the newsgroups or
> internet.  I have your home phone number, your job address and the phone
> numbers and addresses of your neighbors within an eight block radius."
>         -Manny threatens me, in HTML  <#HYTdLnn#GA.320@cpmsnbbsa05>
> 
> "Now damn it, I want my own pedophile group just like bucky boy has.
> Today!!"
>         -Richard  <P_SV2.11572$cq2.768094@newscene.newscene.com>
> 
> "Ah, I see we are being helpful today. Please go away, keep quiet, or
>   stay on topic. And cut down your sig - it exceeds four lines."
>         -Tina Holmboe <7gnr8a$30l$1@mimir.ifi.uio.no>
> 
> "**Get stuffed, phony monseignor---- as for the 'God's children who are
> gay" -- I do not hate the people--- only their depraved lifestyle.
> Get over it.
> Now be gone with you."
>         -Elaine "Romath" Matthews  <375c0788.3349710@news.vianet.on.ca>
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>               AssNipple Publications, Copyright © 1999
>           [Sponsored in part by Bungmunch University Press]
> 
>                 New York  London  Sydney  Toronto
>                 Mexico City  San Fransisco  Tokyo
>                 Madrid  Montreal  Caracas  Milan
>                 Chicago  Nagoya  Austin  Oaxaca
>                         Tigard  San Juan

Back to the UseNet Performance Art of Raoul Xemblinosky
Back to Raoul Xemblinosky Home Page