Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 22:44:53 -0500 From: White 1975 Cordoba <cordo75@moppar.org> Org: The New Small Chrysler Groups: alt.flame.rush-limbaugh, alt.romath, alt.flame, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.mcdonalds.crew
O/Siris wrote: > > In article <3708294E.7535@moppar.org>, cordo75@moppar.org > says... > > > 1) Rush has not ever put forth ANY theory about this > > > "trilateral commission" and has even openly expressed > > > doubts to those who've called and spoken of it. > > > > Yeah, he doubts that they're wacky enough for his liking. > > Don't let reality get in your way there. Just keep > smoking what you're smoking.
Lectured on reality by a dittohead. What next? Milosevic's peace plan for the Middle East?
> > > 2) You've got your conspiracy theorists backwards. It's > > > HILLARY who sees the conspiracy. > > > > You mean the one where Richard Mellon Scaife throws fistfuls > > of dead presidents at anyone who can come up with any dirt, > > real or imagined, on President Clinton? > > > > The one that Hillary refers to by direct mention. The > one that does not exist. If Richard Mellon Scaife and > his activities prove a conspiracy, then Carville's action > do also. And they don't.
As if I'm supposed to accept your word (or Rush Limbaugh's, presuming that's where you get your ideas) for it. You can call it whatever you want, but if the organized and lavishly financed conservative attempt to discredit President Clinton and disrupt his Presidency isn't a conspiracy, neither was the Russian Revolution.
> > > 3) Ward Connerly, > > > > Member of the African American Hall of Shame. > > Not one iota of fact. Just calling names.
Not my name for him. That one came from an African American journalist.
> > > Margaret Thatcher, > > > > Reagan with a cunt and a functioning cerebellum. > > > > And now turning to vulgarity. Once more without one > single fact.
My sincerest apologies for implying that Thatcher is any less a Social Darwinist idiot than Reagan. I hope your feelings weren't hurt too badly.
> > > Gandhi, > > > > GANDHI likes Rush Limbaugh? As in Mahatma or as in Indira? > > > > Mheh heh heh m heh... > > > > Try some reading comprehension. You appeared to > understand right up to this point. You claimed Rush has > some kind of problem with people of other races or > religions than his own. Rush has great respect for > Gandhi, and has said so. It wasn't about whether Gandhi, > liked, knew, or even cared about a man like Rush.
What you said in <MPG.11717e68463b1fb989803@news.megsinet.net>:
------------------ begin repost ----------------
Ward Connerly, Margaret Thatcher, Gandhi, Elizabeth Dole, JC Watts, Clarence Thomas, I forget his first name, but Mr Washington, head of a private conservative foundation, and that's just a few seconds work to point out that he is very much in respect for greatness.
------------------- end repost -----------------
Your statement "he is very much in respect for greatness" is execrable English, but the least ungrammatical interpretation is that he (Limbaugh) is very much respected.
> > > Elizabeth > > > Dole, JC Watts, Clarence Thomas, I forget his first name, > > > but Mr Washington, head of a private conservative > > > foundation, and that's just a few seconds work to point > > > out that he is very much in respect for greatness. > > > Clinton does NOT live up to that standard. > > > > No, Clinton does NOT live up to their standards. Hell, even > > JC Watts's father has gone on record as saying he can't believe > > that any African American could vote Republican. > > Time, date, and source, please. This smacks of invented > quotes to me.
"A black man voting for the Republicans makes about as much sense as a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders."
http://intellectualcapital.com/issues/issue180/item1827.asp
> > Elizabeth Dole > > was Reagan's pet unionbuster in the 80s. > > Still no facts. You simply put forth allegations as if > your saying them makes them so.
Look up her role (or shall we say non-role) in the Pittston Coal strike of 1988. Liddy just twiddled her thumbs as the Virginia State Police and federal marshals arrested coal miners exercising their legitimate right to strike. And even when she did appoint a mediator, nothing came of it.
> > Clarence Uncle Thomas > > needs no further comment, nor does Mr Washington get any until > > you can get back to me on what this highly influential figure's > > first name happens to be. > > Mr Washington isn't really important. You want to see > what *is* important? What you do to blacks when they > won't stay where you want them to stay. Uncle Tom > references again, hmm? After all, it's not like blacks > are allowed to form their own opinions now, are they?
Blacks are entitled to form their opinions just like everyone else in this country is. But if Clarence Thomas has made one and only contribution to American political life, it is to prove that narrow minded right-wing assholery knows no bounds of race.
> > > 4) Several cities have already initiated lawsuits against > > > gun manufacturers for the ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES of some > > > owners of their LEGAL product, and the Federal Government > > > is investigating the possibility of joining in. And you > > > think they're NOT trying to get them out of the hands of > > > law-abiding citizens? > > > > That is precisely what I believe. Did Gandhi not tell you what > > he thought about the "constitutional right to blast some poor > > idiot's shit away with a LEGALLY BOUGHT GUN?" > > Where did you get idea that I claim ANY sort of > communication with Gandhi? That's some talent for > pulling issues out of thin air.
See above. Any problems you have with expressing your thoughts in English is strictly that... your problem. Not mine.
> I got some news for you, > though, if you want to stick to that false issue: Gandhi > was no citizen of the US, and religious beliefs don't > necessary determine whether or not a right is a right.
That's not what your pals Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell say.
> Owning a gun is a right. Even if Gandhi would have > disliked it.
So is making a living wage for a day's work. Even if Liddy Dole didn't think so when she invented the concept of a six month "training period" in which a new employee could be paid less than the minimum wage.
> > > 5) Name a REAL tax cut the Democrats have ever favored, > > > one that returned money to the people simply because it > > > was their money in the first place? Not a one. Every > > > single initiative ever put forth by Democrats has sought > > > to divide one group from another, to take from one in > > > order to give to another. That isn't necessarily "taxing > > > into the poorhouse" as you so wrongly put it, but it's > > > wrong nonetheless. > > > > The Democrats are trying (not hard enough, but they're trying) > > to ameliorate the lot of the poor American who was born behind > > the economic eight-ball. > > Of course they are. That's why they invent programs that > dump 25% of what is appropriated into budget black holes > that even accounting audits can't reveal. A company run > in like manner would find its officers jailed for fraud. > In government, it's the cost of doing business. > > Bullshit.
And Republican administrations have never, ever indulged in antics like that? In government, that's called standard operating procedure.
> > I'm willing to do without the gold > > plated trim on my car to help out the poor. Why aren't you? > > Who are you to determine that I *have to*?
It's not me. It was some long haired bearded Jewish guy who lived in the first four decades AD.
> Government's > taken on a role it never was intended to have, and it's > time to get out. Charity comes from the home, not the > White House.
Republican charity flows out to people who claim to have damaging information on President Clinton and to other Republicans.
Back to the UseNet Performance Art of Raoul Xemblinosky