Subject: Re: Response to Vicious Slur
From: wilhelp@ix.netcom.com (Bill Palmer) <536gnl$hjg@sjx-ixn3.ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat Oct 05 1:33:57 PM PDT 1996
Newsgroups: aus.flame,alt.fan.karl-Malden.nose,alt.flame,alt.usenet.kooks,austin.flame
(click here to skip to the full "clealy, sir" quote)
In <32562451.7EBE@xi.netcom.com> Raoul Xemblinosky
writes:
In which coward Raoul insists on political correctness
and implies he is immune from a "grease" reference
that I have to made other posters in the past based
solely on their posting behavior. Specifically,
readers to some of the above groups have heard
me say more than once, with confidence, to someone
who seemed to be blocking up the "info. highway":
"I'm not stepping over you, and I'm not stepping
around you, I'm stepping ON you, and I'm not glancing
back down to look at the grease spot on the road where
you were sitting." I will continue to say that
whenever appropriate and true, without any
politically-correct regard to anything at all.
I'm sick and tired of catering to the preternaturally
sensitive whims of politically correct whiners of your
spinelss ilk, Xemblinosky.
>
>Bill Palmer typed:
>>
>> In <325403F6.4791@xi.netcom.com> Raoul Xemblinosky
>> writes:
Xemblinosky offers up a whining, self-pitying, and
entirely fallacious exercise in which the self-same
greasy, typo-pouncing ferret uses a couple of typos
to "prove" me wrong.
[...]
>> >That was a *flame,* Nora? All I remember was a bunch of
>> >typing about the "Palmjob Principle," which consists of
>> >using polysyllabic Latinisms in sentences running on and
>> >on *ad nauseam* and beyond: a sure way to incur the utter
>> >contempt of those who care even a whit for the proper use
>> >of English. As if we meowers don't catch enough flak as
>> >it is. Oh, he also mentioned a "grease spot," which must
>> >have been a reference to my being half Mexican.
>>
>> You know, that comment stings me like an asp. It
>> is clear to me now that you are just another dirty
>> player, who gets desperate and starts cutting
>> very low when my flames get too hot. Fine. Join
>> the others. Be my guest. The libelists and plagiarists
>> will be glad to have another vengeful, dishonest,
>> motile cinder on board.
>
>
>
>Then you shouldn't call names. In keeping with your
>"Palmjob Principle,"
That's the ironic thing about you, Xemblinosky.
You show incredibly thin skin about insisting
that a perfectly appropriate put down of you
is some "ethnic slur", when it is no such thing.
Yet, you have no compunctions about acutally
insulting my distinguised ancestors through
mutilating my name in the purile fashion of
a couple of the lowliest minds on a.u.k.
Sir, your mind fairly oozes with the vile
grease of hypocrisy.
please feel free to complete this
>paragraph with up to one hundred of the words you
>typed in the referenced article. Preferably the nice
>long ones.
>
>> I mentioned "grease spot" because it seemed
>> appropriate based on your posts. It had nothing
>> to do with anybody's ethnicity. Your vile
>> insinuation causes special pain since I have
>> a wealth of Latino and Chicano friends and fans
>> and I would be heart-broken if they read your
>> heedless accusation and thought that my heart had
>> somehow turned and I was no longer the Citizen
>> of the World they love and rely on, or if they
>> feared for one second that I was no longer the
>> Bill Palmer they believed they knew so well.
>
>Heedless accusation? Do you always drop the term
>"grease spot" into your alleged conversations
>with your putative Latino and Chicano friends?
Get ready for one of the most outrageously
fallacious connections I've seen in a long
time:
If
>you ever had one Hispanic friend in your life, he
>or she would have told you *never* to call a
>Mexican a greaser.
So now you take us from "A" (the fact that I told
you what I have told a few others of all ethnic
groups: that if they kept trying to bully me
I would step on them and leave a grease spot
on the "info. highway") to "B" (that I, according
to your lying words just above, call my many Mexican
and Chicano friends "greasers"). Calling THAT
a "devious non sequitur" would be to dignify it
far too much, Xemblinosky.
Clearly, Xemblinosky, you are an ivertebrate
who not only libels me, but who thinks that
the readers don't have the logical capabilites
for getting from A to B.
Typo-pouncers Woof and Wotan should study this
one: How Xemblinosky uses a couple of typos to
claim falsity on the part of the typist!
>
>> And
>> if they are reading this, I want those great Mexican-
>> Americans to know, and all my many Chicano friends,
>> and all those wonderful people in Chihuahua, Durango,
>> Hidalgo, and Qu(i)ntana Roo to hear that Bill Palmer
>> has again been slandered for speaking up frankly on
>> the Net.
Let's here all about that typo, Xemblinosky,
you greasy trace of snail effluvium:
>
>It's QUINTANA Roo, William. Next time you crack open the
>atlas, make sure to copy the names down correctly.
>
>> I want that singing family in Columbia to know
Now a lecture from our wailing, "victimized",
typo-pouncing bucket of slimy, politically correct
grease who thinks that readers can't get from A to B:
Run it on us, Xemblinosky:
>
>That's COLOMBIA, William. As in "Cristobal Colon," the
>man who allegedly discovered the Americas.
>
>> that, and those two kind ladies in Venezuela, and that
>> amazing old gentleman in Peru,
>
>Amazing, hunh? Wait... *don't* tell us...
Two whole typos in a post of several hundred
words! Clealy, sir, have proved me factually
wrong...
And I might add here, Xemblinosky, you greasy
buffoon, that I don't like the implied suggestion
that I am to be intimidated from calling it like I
see it (in following up peoples' posts). Some
people are just "greasy" in the figurative sense
of the word; that fact has noting to do with
ethnicity. Whiners like you would like to
create a thought-police environment, and once
you get started, there will be no stopping you.
Do you think for a moment I would hesitate to
say "I worked like a slave," around a black
friend? After all, most of our ancestors have
been enslaved at one time or another. Carry
things a bit further and European Americans
will start getting offended if you say, "His
idea PALES in comparison with yours." That's
exactly where you are tyoing to take us,
Xemblinosky. But you won't stop there.
Soon it will be politically incorrect to
call something "sinister" because the word
carries an inherent bias against left-handed
people. Try to free yourself from the confines
of your mental peonage, Xemblinosky...you're trying
to cramp my style...
-----------------------
--And as to my wonderful friends, don't you dare knock
them, you unctuous slime-splatter on the timeless
toilet of opprobrium, Xemblinsoky.
>
>> and those hard-working
>> folks in Rio, and that good person of the cloth, and
>> all my friends in Bolivia, and those solid people in
>> Chile who love me like a member of the family, and
>> the crew down in Argentina that's helped me so much--
>> I want those beautiful people to understand that Bill
>> Palmer's heart has not been hardened, that Bill Palmer's
>> mind has not been confused by the vicious slurs to my
>> good name; by the cowardly libels; and by the evil
>> plagiarism of my work.
Next comes one of the more pitful attempts
at a quip I've seen in a long time--and don't
forget, I've read a few Hausmann posts lately:
>
>No plagiarism, no slurs, no case (tricolon, Bill).
Fine example of how unctuous buffoon Xemblinsoky
grasps at greasy straws to wail of political
incorrectness on the part of a poster; then shows
he thinks readers too stupid to go from A to B
logically; and finally demonstrates one of the
more egregious cases of typo-pouncing (even in
a nest of typo-pounders) in using two typos to
"evidence" factual incorrectness.
>
>Dismissed.
Yes, your disingenuous tissue of politically
correct whimpers, egregious logic, and typo-
pouncing stupidities certainly is "dismissed",
Xemblinosky.
copyright FLAME GIANT
Back to the UseNet Performance Art of Raoul Xemblinosky
Back to Raoul Xemblinosky Home Page